[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66813-66815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26590]
[[Page 66813]]
Vol. 78
Wednesday,
No. 215
November 6, 2013
Part II Department of State
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
22 CFR Part 41
Visas: Regulatory Exception to Permit Compliance With the United
Nations Headquarters Agreement and Other International Obligations and
Clarification of the Definition of ``Immediate Family'' for Certain
Nonimmigrant Visa Classifications; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 66814]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 41
[Public Notice 8511]
RIN 1400-AD43
Visas: Regulatory Exception to Permit Compliance With the United
Nations Headquarters Agreement and Other International Obligations and
Clarification of the Definition of ``Immediate Family'' for Certain
Nonimmigrant Visa Classifications
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule creates a regulatory exception to visa
restrictions under applicable laws providing for such an exception, in
order to permit compliance with the Agreement between the United States
and the United Nations Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations
(UNHQA), signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, entered into force
November 21, 1947, and other international obligations. This rule also
clarifies that the Department of State's definition of ``immediate
family'' for classifications and also applies to foreign government
officials who may be admitted in immediate and continuous transit
through the United States, and to all relevant NATO visa
classifications under the Agreement on the Status of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization, National Representatives, and International Staff,
signed at Ottawa, September 20, 1951, entered into force May 18 1954.
DATES: This rule is effective November 6, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Liu, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Legal Affairs, Office of Visa Services, Bureau of
Consular Affairs, Department of State, 2401 E Street NW., Room L-603D,
Washington, DC 20520-0106, (202) 663-1203, email (LiuJN@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why is the Department promulgating this rule?
This rule amends paragraph (d)(4) of 22 CFR 41.21, by broadening
the regulatory exception to visa restrictions under applicable laws
providing for such an exception, in order to allow compliance with the
UNQHA and other international obligations. Currently, 22 CFR
41.21(d)(4) implements exceptions to the visa restrictions that are
contained in the Tom Lantos Bloc Burmese JADE (Junta's Anti-Democratic
Efforts) Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-286), in order to permit the United
States to comply with the UNHQA and other applicable international
agreements, and to permit operation of the U.S. and Burmese diplomatic
missions and other official U.S. business in Burma. Other statutory
visa restrictions contain similar exceptions, which the regulation does
not currently implement. For example, the Secretary of State is also
authorized to prescribe regulations providing for exceptions to the
visa restrictions to permit the United States to comply with the UNHQA
and other applicable international obligations under Section 105(c) of
the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of
2010 (CISADA) (Pub. L. 111-195) and Executive Order 13553, and Section
301(d) of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012
(ITRA) (Pub. L. 112-158) and Presidential Memorandum of October 9,
2012, 78 FR 21183 (Apr. 19, 2013). This rule amends 22 CFR 41.21(d) to
implement exceptions to the visa restrictions contained in such
legislation, to allow the United States to comply with UNHQA and other
applicable international obligations. The term ``international
obligations'' includes ``international agreements,'' and is used to
cover the scope of exceptions authorized by ITRA and CISADA. This final
rule retains the exception authorized by the JADE Act to permit
operation of the U.S. and Burmese missions and other official U.S.
business in Burma.
Additionally, this rule amends 22 CFR 41.21(a)(3) to clarify that,
under the Agreement on the Status of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization, National Representatives, and International Staff, the
definition of ``immediate family'' used for the classifications in INA
101(a)(15)(A) and 101(a)(15)(G) also applies to classifications under
all the NATO visa symbols, where applicable. Similarly, this rule
adopts the same definition of ``immediate family'' for purposes of INA
212(d)(8), which permits the admission of officials of foreign
governments and their immediate families who are in immediate and
continuous transit through the United States without regard to certain
provisions of the INA.
Regulatory Findings
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this rule as a final rule based on its
determination that this regulation involves a foreign affairs function
of the United States and, therefore, in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(1), is not subject to the rule making procedures set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
Because this final rule is exempt from notice and comment
rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553, it is exempt from the regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements set forth at sections 603 and 604 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). Nonetheless,
consistent with section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), the Department certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule regulates individual aliens applying for visas under INA
Sec. 101(A)(15) and does not affect any small entities, as defined in
5 U.S.C. 601(6).
C. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4, 109 Stat. 48, codified at 2 U.S.C. 1532) generally requires
agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may
result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This rule will
not result in any such expenditure, nor will it significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for
purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121).
This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete
with foreign-based companies in domestic and import markets.
E. Executive Order 12866
The Department has reviewed this proposed rule to ensure its
consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866 and has determined that the benefits of this
final regulation outweigh its costs. The Department does not consider
this final rule to be an economically significant action within the
scope of section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order since it is not likely
to have an annual effect on the economy
[[Page 66815]]
of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local or tribal governments or
communities.
F. Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
The Department has considered this rule in light of Executive Order
13563 and affirms that this regulation is consistent with the guidance
therein.
G. Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. The rule will not have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372
and No. 13132.
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
I. Executive Order 13175
The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have
tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose new information collection requirements
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 41
Documentation of nonimmigrants.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the 22 CFR
part 41 is amended as follows:
PART 41--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 41 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104.
0
2. In Sec. 41.21, paragraphs (a)(3) and (d)(4) are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 41.21 Foreign Officials--General.
(a) * * *
(3) Immediate family, as used in INA 101(a)(15)(A), 101(a)(15)(G),
and 212(d)(8), and in classification under the NATO visa symbols, means
the spouse and unmarried sons and daughters, whether by blood or
adoption, who are not members of some other household, and who will
reside regularly in the household of the principal alien. ``Immediate
family'' also includes individuals who:
(i) Are not members of some other household;
(ii) Will reside regularly in the household of the principal alien;
(iii) Are recognized as immediate family members of the principal
alien by the sending Government as demonstrated by eligibility for
rights and benefits, such as the issuance of a diplomatic or official
passport, or travel or other allowances; and
(iv) Are individually authorized by the Department.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) Notwithstanding the visa restrictions imposed by applicable
laws and consistent with a provision in such laws providing for a
regulatory exception to the visa restrictions contained therein, a visa
may be issued to a visa applicant who is otherwise ineligible for a
visa under such laws:
(i) To permit the United States to comply with the United Nations
Headquarters Agreement and other applicable international obligations;
and
(ii) To permit the United States and Burma to operate their
diplomatic missions, and to permit the United States to conduct other
official United States Government business in Burma.
* * * * *
Dated: September 26, 2013.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-26590 Filed 11-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
Add new comment